3 ms·
I think a digital reproduction of biological functionality is more likely and will probably arrive sooner then the long term extension of biological life. Whic
by biohacker42 17y ago
I think a digital reproduction of biological functionality is more likely and will probably arrive sooner then the long term extension of biological life.
Which presents the interesting possibility that some day you may have the chance to download your brain into a virtual one. But your biological self, flesh and bones and brains and identity and all, don't go anywhere, so in a way you're still going to die... but also live on.
- jimbokun 17y ago"you're still going to die... but also live on." No, you are still going to die, full stop. Some other thing, that shares certain characteristics with you, will live on. This is no different than saying that you "live on" through your kids, or through your art or writing. This "thing" might share more in common with you than your kids or artifacts that you leave behind, but you are still dead.
- biohacker42 17y agoThink about it this way. The potassium from the potato chips you had last week is now the memory of your 10th birthday party in your brain. Quite literally none of the matter that was you 10 years ago is still part of you. Even the human skeleton is replaced on average every 9 years, faster in children slower in older people. Are you still you? If so what makes you you? Is it the sum total of mass + thoughts? What if you change your mind, are you different person? What if you piss out the water was you yesterday? In 10 years?
- jimbokun 17y agoYour doppelganger walks in the door just now. By asking probing questions, you establish he has a perfect copy of your memories and experiences, in every detail. He laughs at the same jokes, and cries at the same point of sappy movies you do (even though you never told anyone this). You can not discern any difference. Furthermore, he (apologies if you are female, just global replace the pronoun) has been engineered in a way that he will not age, or forget, or degrade in any way over time the way you will. Given the awkwardness of there being two people with one identity, he carefully explains that it only makes sense that he goes on as the "real you." To facilitate the process, he hands you a loaded gun, and tells you that you know what needs to be done and leaves the room. Do you put the gun up to your head and pull the trigger? If not, why not? Surely, the fact of your memories going on is enough to assure you that you are not really "dying," just making it easier to resolve this complex situation?
- anigbrowl 17y agoWell, insofar as the doppelganger and I have sepata experiences, our personalities have already begun to diverge. Now, if the doppelganger whipped out a pair of EEG helmets and demonstrated that we could sync our experiences - eg, I take a sleeping pill and let my doppelganger go out on the town for a night, but I can easily 'catch up' the following morning - then i'd think about it.
- biohacker42 17y agoI'd ask him to wait until I'm on my death bed and it's clear my death is unavoidable. Then I'd give him the thumbs up, instruct him to keep it real.
- chris11 17y agoI'd argue that it matters whether the replacement is gradual or immediate. There is really no difference for other people if the copy is perfect, but there is a huge difference for me. Let's say I am able to make a perfect digital copy of myself, and immediately after I die. Well, my identity as a person has not in the least bit been affected because I have a perfect digital copy of myself. But the copy of my identity that was destroyed will never experience anything ever again, and that to me is the same as death. However if the process is gradual, and the original copy of my identity experiences the process, then I would not view that as death. Compare my identity to a computer program that you want to be moved to another location. You can either make a copy, and then delete the original, or you could copy one small piece at a time and update the file locations so that the program can be running while file locations are being changed. The only difference for you is that the second is probably a lot more work. But I'd argue that no complete copy was deleted in the second case. And if the program is sentient, I see this as being drastically different for that program.