12 ms·
Can we link the actual source rather than some random tweet? https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/new-statistics-about-national-security-letters-google-transp
by cletus 13y ago
Can we link the actual source rather than some random tweet?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/new-statistics-about-national-security-letters-google-transparency-report https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/new-statistics-about-n...
- _delirium 13y agoThe actual content is the bolded "Update 2013-06-07" text at the top here: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/new-statistics-about-national-security-letters-google-transparency-report https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/new-statistics-about-n... In full: Update 2013-06-07: at the time that we wrote this post [2013-03-06], we asked Google whether its Transparency Report included data about secret FISA court orders that would send data to the NSA. The response we received was extremely vague, but seemed to possibly be "no". In the wake of yesterday's revelations that the NSA was harvesting data from Microsoft, Yahoo!, Google, Facebook, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Youtube and Apple, Google has now clearly confirmed that the numbers in its Transparency Report do not include the number of orders or targets for NSA surveillance.
- ralfd 13y agoWhat is it now? "Possibly no" or "clearly no"? I want a source or reading Googles statement for myself.