4 ms·

Not the best example of good css. The menu covers up the whole screen on my galaxy s2. Might want to think about responsive design.

andyhmltn 13y ago
I'm not sure the page is intended to be responsive (I may be wrong.) It just looks like they are using fluid widths.
- daemonl 13y ago
  Responsive is one thing, but I can't even zoom in on a mobile... Dear all web developers, please resize your Web browser to about a mobile phone width before deploying. Just once. Just to check. Especially if your page is about a web technology.
- daemonl 13y ago
  Responsive is one thing, but I can't even zoom in on a mobile... Dear all web developers, please resize your Web browser to about a mobile phone width before deploying. Just once. Just to check. Especially if your page is about a web technology.
- jenius 13y ago
  It's not intended to be responsive. The fact that it's somewhat fluid was added as an afterthought. This page is documentation for a css library, which is not something you would be using on a tablet (unless something crazy has happened and people are now coding on tablets). I do hear this concern, and will try to adjust the responsiveness a little, but it's a much lower priority for me than actually improving the library (which I have been spending nearly full time on), since I assume the docs will never be actually used on a tablet and rather would be used on some sort of desktop that you are coding on.
hipsters_unite 13y ago
Yep, tried reading and then gave up because the menu was too obtrusive.
pedalpete 13y ago
Even on a tablet, that side menu is horrible. I'm not sure what they were attempting to do with that design, but it fails miserably, and as a result (with the lack of a coherent message of why I would use it) makes me doubt the whole project, which is a shame because it could be great. Please pay attention to details.
- dakrisht 13y ago
  Yeap, same. iPad and Nexus - side menu is awful.
declandewet 13y ago
http://carrot.is http://carrot.is was built with it. Perhaps that changes your mind? :)

andyhmltn 13y ago

I'm not sure the page is intended to be responsive (I may be wrong.) It just looks like they are using fluid widths.

daemonl 13y ago
Responsive is one thing, but I can't even zoom in on a mobile... Dear all web developers, please resize your Web browser to about a mobile phone width before deploying. Just once. Just to check. Especially if your page is about a web technology.
daemonl 13y ago
Responsive is one thing, but I can't even zoom in on a mobile... Dear all web developers, please resize your Web browser to about a mobile phone width before deploying. Just once. Just to check. Especially if your page is about a web technology.
jenius 13y ago
It's not intended to be responsive. The fact that it's somewhat fluid was added as an afterthought. This page is documentation for a css library, which is not something you would be using on a tablet (unless something crazy has happened and people are now coding on tablets). I do hear this concern, and will try to adjust the responsiveness a little, but it's a much lower priority for me than actually improving the library (which I have been spending nearly full time on), since I assume the docs will never be actually used on a tablet and rather would be used on some sort of desktop that you are coding on.

hipsters_unite 13y ago

Yep, tried reading and then gave up because the menu was too obtrusive.

pedalpete 13y ago

Even on a tablet, that side menu is horrible. I'm not sure what they were attempting to do with that design, but it fails miserably, and as a result (with the lack of a coherent message of why I would use it) makes me doubt the whole project, which is a shame because it could be great. Please pay attention to details.

dakrisht 13y ago
Yeap, same. iPad and Nexus - side menu is awful.

declandewet 13y ago

http://carrot.is http://carrot.is was built with it. Perhaps that changes your mind? :)