5 ms·
New software could have ID’d Boston bomber
- bsenftner 13y agoSuper-resolution is the future of a lot of image processing technologies.
- sp332 13y agoThis isn't like most super-resolution techniques, that take multiple images and align them to a higher-resolution grid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-resolution#Geometrical_or_image-processing_superresolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-resolution#Geometrical_o... This is about having a model of what a face should look like, and fitting the data to it. It's like taking a handful of data points and plotting a curve, then interpolating/extrapolating other data points. Except instead of something simple like a bell curve, the model is of a human face! (That means you could feed it random data and it would still come up with a face - grotesquely distorted perhaps, but the model can only make faces.)
- pronoiac 13y agoMachine pareidolia! http://www.flickr.com/photos/unavoidablegrain/sets/72157628855014523/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/unavoidablegrain/sets/721576288...
- jonahx 13y agoThis stuff is really cool, and really frightening. The genie is already out of the bottle.
- brianmorris10 13y agoLooks nothing like the actual image.
- Zimahl 13y agoThe title is a little over-reaching. The software could've given a clearer image of a suspect which would've aided police in finding said suspect. Figuring out who actually placed the bomb in the first place was bottleneck #1 and probably took the bulk of the time. Bottleneck #2 is finding out who that person is and this is made easier with the crowd-sourcing that is local news. Bottleneck #3 is physically finding the person which they even had trouble doing with Boston on lockdown. It's a neat solution to a very real problem, so technically very cool just not what the article is billing it as.
- tantalor 13y agoIf the super resolution software worked, then you don't release the information to the media and you skip step 2. That's important because the suspect will most likely flee once they realize you have their image. Instead you develop leads and set up surveillance.
- denzil_correa 13y agoAnil Jain from Michigan State University (one of the highest ranked h-index in Computer Science) recently published a technical report on the this subject [0]. The technical reports says that they were able to identify Dzhokhar Tsarnaev with a Rank-1 hit against a 1M mugshot background database. [0] http://www.cse.msu.edu/rgroups/biometrics/Publications/Face/KlontzJain_CaseStudyUnconstrainedFacialRecognition_BostonMarathonBombimgSuspects.pdf http://www.cse.msu.edu/rgroups/biometrics/Publications/Face/...
- desigooner 13y agoExcept the Rank-1 hit wasn't against an image from the mugshot database. ..The notable rank-one hit for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is an illustrative example of this potential. However, the hit was against a graduation photograph with similar pose that was tweeted after he had been publically identified, and not a conventional mugshot from a prior arrest.
- tantalor 13y agoYes but Tsarnaev's brother was known to authorities. It's feasible for authorities to index his photo and known family members. If they had put both faces into the search, and matched both with high confidence, the result would have sent up a huge flag because the known relationship.
- altrego99 13y agoObligatory :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU
- na85 13y agoI'd rather live in a world where terrorist attacks happen occasionally than in the movie Minority Report.
- jfoutz 13y agoToo bad. If it's any consolation, there will still be terrorist attacks.
- fiatmoney 13y agoMeaningless unless you know the false positive rate. A technology with a 1% false positive rate over the US population gives you a Minneapolis of people to investigate.
- tantalor 13y agoYou only seed it with persons of interest. They don't want to identify every random person, just persons of interest, wherever they go.