3 ms·
I just tried it on my photo collection and it's incredible. It even works for famous places, e.g. I searched for "western wall" and "dome of the rock" and it fo
by shawabawa3 13y ago
I just tried it on my photo collection and it's incredible. It even works for famous places, e.g. I searched for "western wall" and "dome of the rock" and it found them. I can't imagine how that works
- 0x0 13y agoFor places, could it be cheating and peeking at GPS positions in the EXIf tags?
- shawabawa3 13y agoMy photos don't have GPS positioning. I did manually position them roughly though, but nowhere near accurately enough to know which photo is a specific landmark and which isn't
- elq 13y agoI took a half dozen or so pictures of the sagrada familia, all have gps data in exif. Only one of my pictures contained the famous spirals, the rest were closeups of exterior detail. Only the picture of the spirals showed up in the query. It's very impressive.
- eigenvector 13y agoIt appears to recognize some famous mountains, including Mt Robson (Canada), Mt Rainier (USA) and Cerro Torre (Chile/Argentina).
- eliben 13y agoWhy, imagining is fun. There are tons of photos of these places online, many of them tagged ("breaking news from the dome of the rock", or "here's me and Sam at the western wall"). Collect enough of these and you can attach knowledge to images. Then, you just have to know two images look similar, and you have your classification. Neither of the above is easy - nay, it's very hard. But once you have those two building blocks, this technology is viable. And it's very exciting!