3 ms·
I know pretty much nothing of the physics and very little of the logic, but having listened to a few talks from the CS side of the field, it mostly looks like a
by flatline 13y ago
I know pretty much nothing of the physics and very little of the logic, but having listened to a few talks from the CS side of the field, it mostly looks like a combination of:
- Different hardware. This boils down to different gates/primitive operations, ala [1]. There are currently lots of different proposed methods of how to build the hardware, but I don't know that much about how the physical circuits in a traditional computer work, either.
- Different algorithms. See e.g. Shor's [2]. I think there are only one or two others that have been proven to be more efficiently solvable by quantum means, so a lot more work needs to be done in this area.
The field is in its extreme infancy, and I think it will always be more challenging to program quantum computers by a fairly wide margin.
[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gate http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gate
[2] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shors_algorithm http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shors_algorithm
- marcosdumay 13y agoThere are a few complications, like the impossibility of clonning a state, and the rsult being probabilistic. Also, there is the entire "let's operate that in a mixture of all possible integers" thing, but when I got to read about it, it was surprizinly possible to understand.