3 ms·
I would like to know more, could please explain further and give some examples?
by np422 13y ago
I would like to know more, could please explain further and give some examples?
- ttrreeww 13y agoLet's just say, they would go as far as saying parachute is unproven as it has never undergone a double blined trial. They would then go on and somehow imply parachute is bad for you by citing parachute accidents.... Nicely sourced. It's... disgusting. This is actually not isolated to big pharma, a whole host of other pages on Wikipedia suffer from the same kind of agenda pushing editors.
- jlgreco 13y agoInstead of fabricated strawman examples of what you could imagine they might do, do you have any examples of what they have actually done?
- sfmcjgkbrbm 13y agoElectronic cigarette article summary doesn't mention that they are healthier than tobacco. And the article was much worse in the past.
- jlgreco 13y agoThis page seems to cover that topic adequately: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_cigarette#Health_concerns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_cigarette#Health_con... What exactly is your complaint?
- adventured 13y agoBad example. The e-cig article does a fine job of pointing out that they're healthier than cigarettes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_cigarette#Health_concerns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_cigarette#Health_con... "Proponents of electronic cigarettes often claim that electronic cigarettes deliver the experience of smoking while eliminating the smell and health risks associated with tobacco smoke." "While e-cigarettes may give nicotine addicts more or less the same amount of nicotine as a conventional cigarette, they do not produce the same toxic smoke that can cause lung disease and cancer when inhaled over time. Since there are no products of combustion to be inhaled, no tobacco toxins are inhaled besides nicotine"