24 ms·
1. I think the MIT response is a very good place to start, as I also used it (along with Khan) to do well during high school exams. I would also recommend as a
by b0ttler0cket 14y ago
1. I think the MIT response is a very good place to start, as I also used it (along with Khan) to do well during high school exams. I would also recommend as a further study aid
(http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/EqnsOfPlanes.aspx http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/EqnsOfPlanes....).
I recommend this site because of its concise outlines. MIT OCW is very video based and time consuming (not bad, just a fact). If you want pure, streamlined info (preview, review), then that's what I'm suggesting it for.
2. In terms of a book (esp. a textbook), my experience is that the profusion of text is wearying. I did best when I study intensely for short bouts of time spread over a semester. I believe an outline is more conducive to this approach.
3. As a source for problems to verify her knowledge and to practice the thinking method, I would recommend
(http://people.math.gatech.edu/~cain/notes/calculus.html http://people.math.gatech.edu/~cain/notes/calculus.html)
I'll continue to look. To be honest, however, I have a feeling that the textbook has largely been replaced in favor of more readily accessible information online. Having one seems essential since it's the norm, but I think the online sites dedicated to teaching calculus3 are better suited.
- b0ttler0cket 14y agoAs I said before, I'd continue to look. Here is another outline provided by East Tennessee State University that I think is fairly worthwhile. (http://math.etsu.edu/multicalc/prealpha/ http://math.etsu.edu/multicalc/prealpha/) NB: I'll be using the first link to study Calc3 after I finish doing the AP Calc problems in my book first to review. :)