2 ms·
Stanford et al are a huge leg up when getting your first job out of school. But do they really matter once you have a few years of job experience? When I'm hiri
by jcheng 14y ago
Stanford et al are a huge leg up when getting your first job out of school. But do they really matter once you have a few years of job experience? When I'm hiring I care vastly more about a candidate's last two jobs than where he or she went to school.
- robryan 14y agoDepends on the area of study. For Computer Science and related I think most smart students that aren't in an academic bubble know this. Often it is more intellectual curiosity than any eventual financial payoff that is the major motivating factor.
- rkuykendall-com 14y agoI have been told by many professors that I would earn more by directly entering the workforce. It takes a massive salary increase to catch up to 2-3 years of pay. Intellectual curiosity is really the only reason you can choose graduate school, or you will hate it. I found my undergraduate advanced electives and research with professors exciting and interesting, so I decided I would rather spend 2-3 years learning more and researching, than spending 2-3 working my way up in my first few jobs. I will probably end up someplace similar, but I will enjoy it much more, and I believe be a better person because of it.
- rkuykendall-com 14y agoInterestingly, I think it becomes even less important in graduate school, since only about half of your education comes from the classes you take, and even less for a PHD. After I get my masters, I expect I will be in a very similar position to a student who worked for those 2-3 years. He will be saying to employers, "This is what I worked on, and this is what I created, during my last 2-3 years," and I will be saying the same. The only difference is, I will have classes on top of that, and my work will be guided by an advisor, not a boss.