4 ms·
I'm a bit confused about the 'open resolvers' bit. I searched for the static IP range assigned by my ISP, and a number of results came up: http://openresolverp
by lucaspiller 14y ago
I'm a bit confused about the 'open resolvers' bit. I searched for the static IP range assigned by my ISP, and a number of results came up:
http://openresolverproject.org/search.cgi?mode=search4&search_for=109.224.131.0%2F24 http://openresolverproject.org/search.cgi?mode=search4&s...
This range has a description of "Static IP Pool for xDSL End Users", so is it also home users who have open resolvers?
- bluedino 14y agoVery possible that the router provided by the ISP is mis-configured.
- nwh 14y agoYep, my ISP has three open resolvers in my assigned range, and another 6 in the alternate range. It it grounds to give them a slight prod?
- noselasd 14y agoYour ISP doesn't have 3 open resolvers. Your neighbors have. Your ISP could terminate the contract with those 3 customers, but they won't - they're customers. They could block inbound trafic on port 25 to those 3 customers (if they knew about it), but they have no incentive to. Or they could block all inbound traffic on port 25, which will likely break DNS for a lot of customers.
- baq 14y agoyou meant port 53, i presume?
- noselasd 14y agoups. ofcourse.
- nadinengland 14y agoI don't believe he/she did as for my ISP blocked port 80 and 443 making me resort to port 25 to send emails~
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- nwh 14y agoI meant that they exist within the ISPs ranges, not that the ISP itself owns them.
- dmourati 14y agoI was confused too. It seems the openresolverproject link is reporting more than just open resolvers. Those are active nameservers. I checked two nameserves I had set up at my previous dayjob and was surprised they were on the list. I then checked them manually with dig and found they were in fact not open. Confirmed with this tool: http://dns.measurement-factory.com/cgi-bin/openresolvercheck.pl http://dns.measurement-factory.com/cgi-bin/openresolvercheck... I think the RCODE is important. I also checked 8.8.8.8 but got a result I wasn't expecting.