4 ms·
Such a stupid statement. There should be world peace. The world population should be 300 million for a sustainable future. There were many advanced distributed
by alive-or-not 14y ago
Such a stupid statement. There should be world peace. The world population should be 300 million for a sustainable future.
There were many advanced distributed data systems on the Internet in the early 90's, the Web won to a big degree because of it's simplicity.
- nawitus 14y agoCalling someone stupid is not very nice. You can very well disagree with my opinion, but you can do that without being rude. Your analogy of comparing a different technical solution to world peace seems pretty ridiculous, too.
- jacoblyles 14y agoMan, the earth would suck with 300 million people. We'd lose 80% of our culture and technology. Imagine a world where the only settled country was the USA.
- iso-8859-1 14y agosustainability is more important than culture and technology.
- jacoblyles 14y agoreducing the human population ought to be the last resort, for a humanist.