5 ms·
It's also not true: > if 0 then print "true" end true > 0 == true => false I know why this is the case. But it's a logical inconsistency for users of t
by vor_ 14y ago
It's also not true:
> if 0 then print "true" end
true
> 0 == true
=> false
I know why this is the case. But it's a logical inconsistency for users of the language.
- ufo 14y agoStop trolling please. You are advocating for `==` doing type coercion of arguments and that is almost always a misfeature in any language that has that (and the fix usually involves adding an ugly `===` operator after the fact)