4 ms·
> Joel Skousen has an interesting analysis. A simple visit to his website, and wikipedia page, convinces me that Joel Skousen is about as non-authoritative a s
by SeanLuke 14y ago
> Joel Skousen has an interesting analysis.
A simple visit to his website, and wikipedia page, convinces me that Joel Skousen is about as non-authoritative a source as one can possibly get on this subject.
> Then there is a nuclear strike on the US from Russia and China in retaliation
This is a huge jump in logic without any explanation.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- iterationx 14y agoPerhaps if you spent more than four seconds on his website, you might the analysis interesting, http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html
- SeanLuke 14y ago> "More than ever, I still consider the nuclear attack on America as inevitable, both because the real axis of evil (Russia and China) are still building for that attack, and because our own government is controlled by those intent upon destroying US sovereignty and delivering our nation over to a socialist New World Order." Classic Mormon survivalist subculture crazytalk.
- adventured 14y agoYep, as even if you assumed half of that were correct, it wouldn't change the fact that Russia and China have absolutely no desire to commit suicide by nuclear war, and particularly over North Korea. If those countries wanted to commit nuclear suicide, they could have and would have done it a long time ago. The past had a lot more provocations that could have been used to justify it, than the recent times have.
- iterationx 14y agoHe presents arguments why it is not nuclear suicide. If you weren't so smug you might learn something.