3 ms·
No, general public needs to learn about his integrity, erudition and impeccable scientific standing. This is important because Dyson's opponents as a rule try
by 1gor 18y ago
No, general public needs to learn about his integrity, erudition and impeccable scientific standing.
This is important because Dyson's opponents as a rule try some sort of character assassination instead of sticking to the subject matter.
- kingkongrevenge 18y agoStill, the writing is horrible.
- prewett 18y agoHaving gone to the article hoping for details on why Dyson disbelieves global warming, I'm disappointed like you. On reflection, I think the author intended the article to be about Dyson himself, and as such, I kind of like the writing. But, yeah, I'm disappointed about the lack of details.
- electromagnetic 18y agoThe title of the article here is misleading. He isn't the global warming heretic, he's always been a heretic in everything that he's done or talked about. The simple fact is he's quite often accurate.
- dschobel 18y agoThe article is more of a character study and description of modern science when it crosses into politics / pop-culture. Dyson's view is simple: he thinks the doom & gloom predictions of those who are forecasting the end of life within the next hundred years is simply not borne out by the facts.