Don't take it too literally. It's meant as a kind of linguistic koan to illustrate the concept of prosody. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosody_(linguistics)

Don't take it too literally. It's meant as a kind of linguistic koan to illustrate the concept of prosody. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosody_(linguistics) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosody_(linguistics) Consider the difference in how one says He ate that vs He ate that? That's prosody. The difference in meaning isn't a consequence of the presence of the question mark, although that's what people think of as "grammatical." The presence of the question mark and the difference in meaning are both consequences of the prosodic differences between the two sentences. This shows one of many challenges inherent computational linguistics: "the written word" only encapsulates a small part of what it means to "speak English" or "understand English." As a nice benefit, it makes the sort of grammarian who obsesses over the written word look (rightly) like they're missing the forest for the trees.