The whole basis of law is elimination of "epistemic uncertainty" and threshold of evidence for an event. If this is not possible, the case is not proved, theref

The whole basis of law is elimination of "epistemic uncertainty" and threshold of evidence for an event. If this is not possible, the case is not proved, therefore case dimissed. Sherlock Holme's statement is a statement of method, not statement of proof. In other words, the law is far greater than Bayesian probability or any method, including scientific, since the burden of proof is from the evidence with the primary legal threshold of "innocent until proven guilty".