3 ms·
I think the reason its priced like that is its far more profitable than any other way. Developers like loads of repo's for their many side projects etc. Just a
by TamDenholm 14y ago
I think the reason its priced like that is its far more profitable than any other way. Developers like loads of repo's for their many side projects etc.
Just a note though, if you're a consulting company and cant afford $200 a month for the 125 repo's, you should be charging more.
- cdavid 14y ago200 $ / month is indeed nothing. The problem is when you need more. Arguably, github enterprise follows exactly the model of price per collaborator.
- LordIllidan 14y agoWhy should we pay 200$ a month though when there's a competitor with a far better plan?
- kondro 14y agoBecause the competitor has inferior features.
- LordIllidan 14y agoGithub's extra features aren't all that useful to us though - certainly not worth the extra expense. And yes, I do know that rates should be increased and that even 200$ a month are a drop in the bucket to some startups - but not to all startups, especially non US-based ones.