3 ms·
If you want to debug the metrics they're using, you're more than welcome to do it. I've got plenty of direct experience to question the results shown by a rando
by timr 14y ago
If you want to debug the metrics they're using, you're more than welcome to do it. I've got plenty of direct experience to question the results shown by a random webpage on the internet, and not much incentive to figure out why this particular set of benchmarks looks wrong.
A quick inspection of the tests suggests a high enough bogon count that it already begins to confirm my suspicions: there's a "fasta-redux" test for Perl which dramatically outperforms the "fasta" test that's implemented cross-language. Also, many of these tests are written in least-common-denominator style, which doesn't reflect the way the languages are actually used.
- igouy 14y agoNope -- The Perl fasta program is 109x slower than the C fasta program; and the Perl fasta-redux program is about 112x slower than the C fasta-redux program.