4 ms·
I think you're just not using modern terminology: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star&l=
by svachalek 14y ago
I think you're just not using modern terminology:
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star&l=
- brador 14y agoDon't forget the http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Ninja&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Ninja&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Guru&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Guru&l=
- skyebook 14y agoIt would seem the guru market is crashing pretty hard after solid growth. Might be smart to do some job retraining to become a ninja
- bsg75 14y agoOr this: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star%2C+engineer%2C+programmer&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star%2C+engineer%2C+p... Compared to this: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star%2C+engineer%2C+programmer&l=&relative=1 http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=rock+star%2C+engineer%2C+p...
- thaumaturgy 14y agoCute, but that graph ranges from 0 to 0.04 percent -- it would be just a blip on the other graph, which ranges from 0 to 10 percent.
- joezydeco 14y agoFTFY: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=engineer%2C+programming%2C+engineering%2C+rock+star&l=&relative=1 http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=engineer%2C+programming%2C...
- thaumaturgy 14y agoI can't tell if you're being serious or not.
- joezydeco 14y agoTotally serious. I changed the graph to "relative" to show growth of the term over the period.
- crntaylor 14y agohttp://xkcd.com/1102/ http://xkcd.com/1102/
- thaumaturgy 14y agoJust in case the xkcd that crntaylor posted doesn't explain the situation well enough: Let's assume that there's 10,000 total job postings in your graph. If the "rock star" trend grew from just 1 posting to just 70 postings, that would represent a 7000% growth over the period, even though "rock star" would still represent just .007 of the total market. Growth graphs answer a very specific kind of question, and it's rarely the question that people mean to ask. Or, put another way: click the "Absolute" link next to "Scale", under "engineer, programming, engineering, rock star Job Trends".
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- ChuckMcM 14y agoLong past the salad days of the code monkey http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=code+monkey&l= http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=code+monkey&l= I think its an interesting way to drive traffic to the site. A variation on the "does this house from your neighborhood look like its worth a million bucks?" kinds of things I've seen Realtors do. Any serious analysis of the health of the STEM job market would have to be a bit more rigorous than a text match search.
- eranation 14y agoI think people are looking for candidates in alternative places, via Github, SE careers 2.0, coderwall, twitter, IRC, linkedin (direct connections), meetups, hacker news, and less via major job listing sites that indeed crawls. But it's a good question. Anyone feeling all of a sudden that it's easier to fill an engineer's position? EDIT: the absolute graph is described as "percentage of matching job postings" so it's absolute (total number of jobs), but still "relative" to "other" job titles. so theoretically, one explanation could be that the economy was recovering faster on the tech industry, but now other sectors are catching up... (just a thought, not sure I'm even convinced, but still worth checking). EDIT2: Seems that a clearly defined crash is not what most recruiters think about for 2013: http://media.dice.com/report/december-2012-special-edition-hiring-survey/ http://media.dice.com/report/december-2012-special-edition-h...
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]