3 ms·
No, I agree with your point. I just take it further by holding consumers responsible for fueling that violence when they could have done otherwise, not contribu
by jfornear 18y ago
No, I agree with your point. I just take it further by holding consumers responsible for fueling that violence when they could have done otherwise, not contributed to demand by obeying the laws.
- jimbokun 18y agoTo make an analogy, it is similar to supporting sweat shop labor by buying Nikes (or whatever companies still use sweat shop labor). The argument in the case of illegal drugs is that handing over money to people engaged in violence makes it more likely the violence will continue.