3 ms·
currently known physics is not good enough.. It is quite an arbitrary classification. What is so special about "current" knowledge...
by lolakutty 10d ago
currently known physics is not good enough..
It is quite an arbitrary classification. What is so special about "current" knowledge...
- hardbass 10d agoIf you think current physics is insufficient but future physics might be sufficient, I can accept that but its still an unfounded belief. If you truly believe something "more" is needed, then you are placing a bet that always lost for centuries. Bets in anything supernatural or aphysical have always and consistently failed till now.
- lolakutty 10d agoAny sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Not my words.
- hardbass 10d agoThat magic means a different thing from supernatural magic.
- lolakutty 10d agoOh, What does it mean then? You are so amusing....
- hardbass 10d agoIts a purely physical mechanism but one that is currently beyond our understanding. "Magic" magic is belief in souls, eg brains have aphysical magic.
- lolakutty 10d agoWhy do you think "souls" can't have some physical mechanism that is beyond our current understanding?
- hardbass 10d agoIf you think "souls" have some physical mechanism then they are not souls by the definition I am using. We would then agree, though I do not yet think we have found reason for new physical laws to be required, however that can of course be a possibility.
- lolakutty 10d ago>they are not souls by the definition Kindly share that concrete definition..
- hardbass 10d agoIt should have been clear from our discussion when I said "souls" I meant belief in the non-physical. Magic juice in the brain that is unexplainable by physics at all. Being unexplainable by current physics but explainable by future physics is not a "soul" by that definition.
- lolakutty 10d ago> non-physical. Now, what is your definition for this?