3 ms·
Because it'll create value. Value which won't bring anything to anyone. I mean, a couple of people can be more richerer, but we and them won't have a planet to
by bayindirh 14d ago
Because it'll create value.
Value which won't bring anything to anyone. I mean, a couple of people can be more richerer, but we and them won't have a planet to spend or enjoy these theoretical riches at the end.
So, no biggie.
- reactordev 14d agoLobbyists lies a foot. “We can’t provide more power with these pesky regulations”
- tosapple 14d agodefine 'climate pollution', this is all fine and well until they apply it to nuclear shielding.
- harimau777 14d agoI'm not clear what you mean. While nuclear waste is certainly a thing that could hurt the environment if mismanaged, impacting the climate isn't really a way that it does so. The shielding also seems like an unusual thing to focus on as opposed to the waste itself.
- tosapple 14d ago'shielding', is applied to both the energy extraction process of fission activity AND the remnants. you're definitely not clear on the meaning.
- plorkyeran 14d agoYeah, I'm definitely not clear on what you're trying to mean. How about you actually state your point rather than vaguely alluding to something?
- tosapple 13d ago[dead]
- cyanydeez 14d agoDisaster capitalism is pretty much current AI is to future AI use
- throw0101a 14d ago> Because it'll create value. The New Yorker published Tom Toro's one-panel comic/cartoon in 2012, and here we are in 2026: * https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995 https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995