4 ms·
I'm saving time. It's implementing features in a few hours that would have taken me weeks to implement. I can review code much faster than I can create well r
by teliskr 14d ago
I'm saving time. It's implementing features in a few hours that would have taken me weeks to implement. I can review code much faster than I can create well reasoned, implemented and tested solutions.
- lolakutty 14d agoCan you tell me what the most complex thing (software) that you have yourself implemented is?
- senordevnyc 14d agoThis faux socratic method flavor of AI skepticism is so cringe at this point, and reeks of your own insecurity in your beliefs. We get it, you don't think AI is useful for the type of coding people claim it is. Why on earth would anyone try and convince you at this point?
- lolakutty 14d ago>AI is useful This is not a binary thing. It could be useful at the same time detrimental in some manner. Look at smartphones. I am just raising the possibilities if one use LLMs indiscriminately to generate code.
- senordevnyc 14d agoNo, that would be more honest. Instead you’re asking loaded questions as if anyone owes you an explanation or proof.
- lolakutty 14d agoDon't answer then...its as simple as that... They can LLM themselves to complete lock in for all I care...
- senordevnyc 14d agolol, yeah, you clearly don’t care at all
- lolakutty 14d agoI care about other things. Like my amusement that I get when I see the AI praising accounts go silent once they are pushed a bit...
- senordevnyc 13d agoProbably because it's utterly pointless to try and convince someone in 2026 that LLMs are useful for coding. Why waste time trying to talk to someone with their head in the sand?
- lolakutty 13d ago>LLMs are useful for coding.. No one said they are not...look at my comment above in this thread! Why are you so mad lol...
- deleted 14d ago[deleted]