3 ms·
I think that wouldn't change much. They would just make use of more grapheme clusters. For emojies they already make heavy use of the Zero-Width-Joiner. So a w
by sharktheone 6d ago
I think that wouldn't change much. They would just make use of more grapheme clusters.
For emojies they already make heavy use of the Zero-Width-Joiner. So a woman firefighter is the woman emoji + ZWJ + fire engine. Sure the UTF-8000 approach is much better encoding size wise.
- mitxela 6d agoI wonder how they're going to encode a female fire engine in the future.
- Dylan16807 6d agoNo worries, that would use female sign, not woman.
- sharktheone 6d agoI don't understand why you are saying this. That just seems a bit inappropriate
- mitxela 6d agoIt's a joke based on the construction of emojis? Female plus fire engine obviously denotes a female fire engine but has apparently been repurposed as a female firefighter instead