3 ms·
If this ever became widespread, people would game the "verified real" checkmark using the analog gap. 1. Print AI photo 2. Point fancy expensive camera at prin
by pixelsort 14d ago
If this ever became widespread, people would game the "verified real" checkmark using the analog gap.
1. Print AI photo
2. Point fancy expensive camera at printed photo
3. Take a "real" photo
Then you'd see more sensors and even more expensive cameras. Then you'd see miniatured virtual-production volumes.
So, this is not a solution. It's just an arms race disguised as one.
- augunrik 14d agoCan you photograph a photo so it’s not really noticeable?
- dexen 14d agoYes to arbitrarily good degree with hobby grade tooling. The previous gen photo tech (b&w negative film, colour negative film) used device called enlarger† which is pretty much taking a photo of a photo. † https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlarger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlarger
- nolok 14d agoI've been able to get some truly great digital copy of old analog printed photo using Google snapseed and a sub 1k€ smartphone and that was almost a decade ago, so I'm pretty sure anyone dedicated can.
- ImHereToVote 14d agoThis would make deepfakes more expensive because you would have to tightly control the chroma and illuminance of the display.
- tacomagick 14d agoSomething a calibration tool surely can do I assume.
- ImHereToVote 13d agoFakes were always possible. Just labor intensive or costly.