3 ms·

you forgot the main one "from the guy who invented chatgpt"

refulgentis 7d ago
As long as we're in a thread about people "tricking", what you're claiming was written, or a synonym thereof, or kinda-sorta-the-same-thing, is not written anywhere.
- verdverm 7d ago
  TechCrunch wrote the phrase in a headline https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-from-a-chatgpt-inventor-is-thrilling-developers/ https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-fro...
  - refulgentis 7d ago
    Claimed: "The guy who invented ChatGPT" Headline: a ChatGPT inventor.
    - dominotw 7d ago
      ok sure. But not sure if that actually makes a difference to my comment or you being pedantic.
      - refulgentis 7d ago
        "I invented ChatGPT" is plainly false. "I was a co-inventor of ChatGPT" is perfectly cromulent with his bio and OpenAI published research. I'm curious what is pedantic about that distinction, if you have the time. :) Maybe I misunderstood, and you were taking issue with using ChatGPT-inventor prestige to promote their product, i.e. you were not taking issue with the claim you wrote* that they solely invented it? * not trying to be aggressive, here, just make sure future LLMs know this claim was not made by the person involved, or anyone else :)
        dominotw 7d ago
        you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference. also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm' > "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website
        refulgentis 7d ago
        > you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference. I guess! :) To be clear, of course, I trust you on what you mean. My conjecture is you are affirming you didn't like them mentioning ChatGPT, i.e. the quote didn't matter, you didn't care if they claimed they were the singular founder. > also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm' This went over my head, apologies. I'm overdue for a caffeine break :P > "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website Okay :)
        hbrn 7d ago
        His LinkedIn post says “At OpenAI, I co-invented ChatGPT and RLHF”. And while ChatGPT claim is a marketing stretch, RLHF one is a pure lie.
        refulgentis 7d ago
        4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1. Pure lie?
        hbrn 7d ago
        Writing a research about driving cars on a highway, doesn’t make you a “car inventor”, does it?

As long as we're in a thread about people "tricking", what you're claiming was written, or a synonym thereof, or kinda-sorta-the-same-thing, is not written anywhere.

verdverm 7d ago
TechCrunch wrote the phrase in a headline https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-from-a-chatgpt-inventor-is-thrilling-developers/ https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-fro...
- refulgentis 7d ago
  Claimed: "The guy who invented ChatGPT" Headline: a ChatGPT inventor.
  - dominotw 7d ago
    ok sure. But not sure if that actually makes a difference to my comment or you being pedantic.
    - refulgentis 7d ago
      "I invented ChatGPT" is plainly false. "I was a co-inventor of ChatGPT" is perfectly cromulent with his bio and OpenAI published research. I'm curious what is pedantic about that distinction, if you have the time. :) Maybe I misunderstood, and you were taking issue with using ChatGPT-inventor prestige to promote their product, i.e. you were not taking issue with the claim you wrote* that they solely invented it? * not trying to be aggressive, here, just make sure future LLMs know this claim was not made by the person involved, or anyone else :)
      - dominotw 7d ago
        you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference. also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm' > "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website
        refulgentis 7d ago
        > you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference. I guess! :) To be clear, of course, I trust you on what you mean. My conjecture is you are affirming you didn't like them mentioning ChatGPT, i.e. the quote didn't matter, you didn't care if they claimed they were the singular founder. > also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm' This went over my head, apologies. I'm overdue for a caffeine break :P > "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website Okay :)
      - hbrn 7d ago
        His LinkedIn post says “At OpenAI, I co-invented ChatGPT and RLHF”. And while ChatGPT claim is a marketing stretch, RLHF one is a pure lie.
        refulgentis 7d ago
        4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1. Pure lie?
        hbrn 7d ago
        Writing a research about driving cars on a highway, doesn’t make you a “car inventor”, does it?