4 ms·
I'm always a little surprised when I don't see mentions of FSP [1] in works like this. For a short time, it seemed to be the warez transfer means of choice for
by simmons 15d ago
I'm always a little surprised when I don't see mentions of FSP [1] in works like this. For a short time, it seemed to be the warez transfer means of choice for those looking to fly under the radar and avoid detection. (So I'm told.) But maybe it wasn't much more than a footnote in the grand scheme of things.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Service_Protocol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Service_Protocol
- nikanj 15d agoI always thought FXP was a much more common tool, as you could move releases between beefy servers without having to download them first https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_eXchange_Protocol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_eXchange_Protocol
- lm411 15d agoI was in a small courier group way back when. FXP was definitely common. We could copy a lot of software in a small amount of time.
- bitwize 15d agoI'm old enough to remember when IRC DCC fservs were a popular distribution channel.
- ozozozd 15d agoPhrozen Crew and UCF on Efnet, right?
- slyall 15d agoMy impression was that FSP was when you had an account on a Unix server at a University and wanted to slowly move files without attracting attention When people had their own internet connected machine other protocols were much better choices.
- chadgpt5 15d agoWarez isn't a single network, so some sites may have used other protocols. One day I realised bittorrent is a part of the warez scene
- j4k3 15d agoI remember FSP seeming to have a more "underground" vibe to it. This was right after migrating from BBS to "Shell Account". Shortly after every noob was told: "FtP to 127.0.0.1 for l33t w4R3Z!", and then the gobsmacked horror as you were loooking at your own home directory. laf.