4 ms·
In a communist society there is no profit (or incentive for), thus no need for copyright laws. It's not abolishing copyrights that would turn the US into a com
by vitorfblima 16d ago
In a communist society there is no profit (or incentive for), thus no need for copyright laws.
It's not abolishing copyrights that would turn the US into a commie country, communism is about abolishing private ownership to the means of production.
- deleted 16d ago[deleted]
- card_zero 16d agoWell it's worth reading the linked wiki article section, which includes a link to another article "Copyright law of the Soviet Union", flatly contradicting you unless you maintain that the USSR wasn't truly communist.
- echoangle 16d ago> unless you maintain that the USSR wasn't truly communist. Didn’t they themselves say they were a socialist society on the path to communism? Does anyone think the USSR was communist?
- deleted 16d ago[deleted]
- vitorfblima 16d agoThe USSR was a socialist state, which is different.
- sicher 16d agoAnd non-democratic.
- dataviz1000 16d agoIn the United State, the individual or corporation owns the invention. In the Soviet Union the state automatically owned the invention. That clause is what ensures private ownership. The clause is what ensures profits from market sales or licensing of ideas go to the creator. Removing (or ignoring in the case of AI companies) that clause in the US Constitution is what abolishes private ownership.
- vitorfblima 16d agoI have private ownership over many things that I've bought which are not inventions and are not infringing copyrights.