4 ms·
Only if the intent was there which it doesnt seem to be.
by AuthAuth 15d ago
Only if the intent was there which it doesnt seem to be.
- NDlurker 15d agoIf I were to fire a gun randomly at an apartment building and kill people, but my intent was to only do property damage, does that mean I didn't commit murder? Intent does not matter when the outcome is people dying.
- AuthAuth 15d agoThats different to a military conflict where you are legally allowed to target and kill people you believe to be enemy combatants. Its up to Iran to protect their civilans at the end of the day. Im not even sure this should be prosecuted as a war crime since Iran does not participate in the international law of armed conflict.
- sedan_baklazhan 15d ago> Im not even sure this should be prosecuted as a war crime since Iran does not participate in the international law of armed conflict. Wow. International treaties do not free you of your obligations on the basis of other side of war commitment to them. I don’t even need to check if the statement is true, because it absolutely is irrelevant.
- NDlurker 15d agoYou have no morals. I can't comment further or I will be banned from this board.
- sedan_baklazhan 15d agoNeither morale nor any understanding of international war rule treaties.
- sedan_baklazhan 15d agoUnintentional double tap, followed by highest level accusations of Iran bombing its own school with Tomahawk missiles bought somewhere, sounds very plausible.