3 ms·

I use them. Daily. Gemini hasn’t been a contender by comparison for a long time.

baq 16d ago
True but it has a niche in SQL reviews for me. Looks like Google has a lot of good sql in their corpus and in their RL digital lobotomy factory.
safog 16d ago
I wonder if it's a harness thing or a model thing at this point. I feel all coding models are quite capable for most tasks I want them to do. Most of the time I don't need what the bench tests and I'm not really giving them completely ambiguous tasks without any refinement. I only find marginal differences between models at this point and it almost feels like personality quirks in each model than anything.
- BenzeneDream 16d ago
  When comparing OpenAI and Claude thats pretty much true, but not Gemini... And have you tried Antigravity? Yikes
  - vrosas 16d ago
    The CLI version of agy is great. Have you tried it?
    - taylorfinley 16d ago
      Do you dangerously allow permissions? I absolutely cannot use it until they ship an auto approver. As it is now I have it write one bash/python script to do everything it wants to, then I review that. Otherwise it is COMPLETELY unusable and it shocks me when I hear people are using it.
      - xnx 16d ago
        Sounds like they shipped some changes today that might reduce approvals: https://x.com/antigravity/status/2100001904969297980 https://x.com/antigravity/status/2100001904969297980
      - andai 16d ago
        alias agy="agy --dangerously-skip-permissions"
      - cute_boi 16d ago
        is anti gravity open sourced just like codex or grok code?
      - vrosas 15d ago
        Yes, but I dangerously allow claude and codex, too...
      - akho 15d ago
        Why not allow everything? It's not like it can do much inside the container.
    - VectorLock 16d ago
      Compared to gemini-cli that they took out behind the woodshed, I hate it.
  - qingcharles 16d ago
    I've used Antigravity as my main coding agent on one of my biggest projects for about a year. It's been great for me. (and I use Claude, Codex, Grok and Muse for all the other projects)
le-mark 16d ago
I did a test involving implementing cobol control flow in Java for a source to source translation project. Gemini was the only model to get the edge cases. Cobol is very peculiar in this regard.
- robotmay 16d ago
  It's very good at Elixir in my experience too. And it just does what I ask and doesn't wind me up like Opus. I don't think I've had to insult it more than once per day.
adventured 16d ago
I had a typical $20 Gemini plan that I just downgraded to their $5 plan (to keep access to some of the models). It had been so long since I let Gemini work on (or review) any code / design / html (anything) that I couldn't justify bothering to keep wasting money on it. It fell behind badly over the past year. Astra might as well be an alien super intelligence at code compared to Gemini. I enjoy talking to Gemini, it is very good at conversation, I get solid answers to everyday questions. I intend to keep the $5 plan indefinitely for basic use. I don't expect they'll ever resurface as a competitor in coding with Astra & Fable et al.

baq 16d ago

True but it has a niche in SQL reviews for me. Looks like Google has a lot of good sql in their corpus and in their RL digital lobotomy factory.

safog 16d ago

I wonder if it's a harness thing or a model thing at this point. I feel all coding models are quite capable for most tasks I want them to do. Most of the time I don't need what the bench tests and I'm not really giving them completely ambiguous tasks without any refinement. I only find marginal differences between models at this point and it almost feels like personality quirks in each model than anything.

BenzeneDream 16d ago
When comparing OpenAI and Claude thats pretty much true, but not Gemini... And have you tried Antigravity? Yikes
- vrosas 16d ago
  The CLI version of agy is great. Have you tried it?
  - taylorfinley 16d ago
    Do you dangerously allow permissions? I absolutely cannot use it until they ship an auto approver. As it is now I have it write one bash/python script to do everything it wants to, then I review that. Otherwise it is COMPLETELY unusable and it shocks me when I hear people are using it.
    - xnx 16d ago
      Sounds like they shipped some changes today that might reduce approvals: https://x.com/antigravity/status/2100001904969297980 https://x.com/antigravity/status/2100001904969297980
    - andai 16d ago
      alias agy="agy --dangerously-skip-permissions"
    - cute_boi 16d ago
      is anti gravity open sourced just like codex or grok code?
    - vrosas 15d ago
      Yes, but I dangerously allow claude and codex, too...
    - akho 15d ago
      Why not allow everything? It's not like it can do much inside the container.
  - VectorLock 16d ago
    Compared to gemini-cli that they took out behind the woodshed, I hate it.
- qingcharles 16d ago
  I've used Antigravity as my main coding agent on one of my biggest projects for about a year. It's been great for me. (and I use Claude, Codex, Grok and Muse for all the other projects)

le-mark 16d ago

I did a test involving implementing cobol control flow in Java for a source to source translation project. Gemini was the only model to get the edge cases. Cobol is very peculiar in this regard.

robotmay 16d ago
It's very good at Elixir in my experience too. And it just does what I ask and doesn't wind me up like Opus. I don't think I've had to insult it more than once per day.

adventured 16d ago

I had a typical $20 Gemini plan that I just downgraded to their $5 plan (to keep access to some of the models). It had been so long since I let Gemini work on (or review) any code / design / html (anything) that I couldn't justify bothering to keep wasting money on it. It fell behind badly over the past year. Astra might as well be an alien super intelligence at code compared to Gemini. I enjoy talking to Gemini, it is very good at conversation, I get solid answers to everyday questions. I intend to keep the $5 plan indefinitely for basic use. I don't expect they'll ever resurface as a competitor in coding with Astra & Fable et al.