3 ms·
Well then you haven't listened to Ed Zitron or any of the other AI bubble doomers. His contention is that its worthless and they lose money on every query.
by sphinxterai 2mo ago
Well then you haven't listened to Ed Zitron or any of the other AI bubble doomers. His contention is that its worthless and they lose money on every query.
- embedding-shape 2mo agoBut isn't he taking all the costs into account, that created the experience? Rather than just literally the inference/serving infrastructure? Bananas way of calculating things if so, doesn't match reality at all.
- JumpCrisscross 2mo agoZitron is worthless–lying about numbers and not correcting the record when you're called out means you aren't trustworthy. Worse than that if you directionally agree with him, which I do.
- rowanG077 2mo agoHe makes his money and fame by spewing bulshit as many grifters before him. Which unfortunately probably hides the real truth. That large labs do have potential problems with long term profitability.
- freejazz 2mo agoisn't that when the training costs are actually accounted for?
- dwaltrip 2mo agoNot for operating profit. Training is a one-time cost that gets amortized across every query. And either way, the training of new base models will eventually slow from the current frantic pace.
- freejazz 2mo ago>Not for operating profit. Training is a one-time cost that gets amortized across every query. But people are saying its not part of the calculation to generate the cost of a query... >And either way, the training of new base models will eventually slow from the current frantic pace. Sure, maybe.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]