2 ms·
No, that’s not accurate. An agreement among competitors to not engage in research that would let them outcompete each other is clearly an antitrust issue requir
by SpicyLemonZest 13d ago
No, that’s not accurate. An agreement among competitors to not engage in research that would let them outcompete each other is clearly an antitrust issue requiring a government waiver.
- jubilanti 13d agoNo, absolutely not "clearly". That word has no business being in any sentence about federal antitrust law in 2026. There is nothing clear or consistent about how is being applied and interpreted right now. If you're applying a coder's mindset to 'settled' law, you're in for a bad time.
- SpicyLemonZest 13d agoIf that’s true, doesn’t that make it even more clear that the frontier labs require government involvement and cannot rely on what David Sacks thinks the government would or would not allow?
- AndyNemmity 13d agoI mean, they said it was clearly an anti trust issue. It is. It is also true that nothing in law is currently clear, or consistent. Both are true. But you stated it's one or the other.