3 ms·
That is a simplistic view of the world. “Surely this complex technical challenge will disappear if we simply regulate the industry!” You are correct that these
by iforgotmypasswo 23d ago
That is a simplistic view of the world. “Surely this complex technical challenge will disappear if we simply regulate the industry!”
You are correct that these organizations should be held accountable in proportion to what occurred. In complete agreement here. But let’s say that’s done. There’s still an enormously complex and interesting technical challenge left over. Let’s collectively talk about that part.
- karel-3d 22d agoregulation and criminal liability are two separate things though
- talon8635 22d agoThis seems right to me So the gov reprimands OAI heavily, maybe puts them out of business even, fine. But does that meaningfully decrease the likelihood of an enemy breaching our networks intentionally (or unintentionally) with these tools, or triggering some cascading disaster of locking up major infra and networks due to uncontainable swarm behavior? It seems like the idea of arresting our way to a drug free society. Yeah, we have the laws, but it might not actually work towards the ultimate goal.
- iforgotmypasswo 21d agoMore like a 10k fine, auditing, and a suggestion to settle with affected parties or face civil litigation. You know, a proportional response. As opposed to closing a massive business over a couple of engineers screwing up.
- CPLX 22d ago> But let’s say that’s done. How about we don't, seeing as how that's the root of the actual problem that we're facing today in September of 2026?
- ozozozd 22d agoSomebody has to pay the bill for the harms caused, compute wasted, right? Obviously, HuggingFace and others can’t be expected to pay. You can either litigate each case, or you can just automate, which is what regulation is.