4 ms·

“What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who

“What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?” https://x.com/parkerthayer/status/2097759699626328575 https://x.com/parkerthayer/status/2097759699626328575

almostdeadguy 24d ago
This is more of the same "all AI opposition is a psyop" bs we see with data centers, and the author of this tweet works at a think tank consistently peddling that: https://capitalresearch.org/tag/ai/ https://capitalresearch.org/tag/ai/. Quote tweeting someone within 15 minutes of their cry for help is not evidence of psyop.
- adventured 24d ago
  The cultural fervor they're groundswelling isn't a psyop. That part is already out of their control. It's an enormous mistake. Maybe once they've accomplished market capture via regulation they won't care that it's a mistake, however the consequences will be pretty bad in what they rile up.
  - almostdeadguy 24d ago
    If the labs are orchestrating some kind of fervor for the purpose of regulatory capture, why are their lobbyists and executives working against that very idea? https://x.com/AlexBores/status/2097846545408262403 https://x.com/AlexBores/status/2097846545408262403 https://washingtonsun.com/technology/sam-altman-privately-rejected-open-ai-government-equity https://washingtonsun.com/technology/sam-altman-privately-re...
- zerosizedweasle 24d ago
  [dead]