3 ms·
Doing some research and at this point doing it very much in the open with dates on GitHub so if any AI Lab says they re-discover my exact work it will be obviou
by r0ze-at-hn 1mo ago
Doing some research and at this point doing it very much in the open with dates on GitHub so if any AI Lab says they re-discover my exact work it will be obvious that the AI used or was trained on my work. I am guessing anyone in a similar situation is now thinking about how they date their existing work if the math is done, but the proses are not.
- riedel 1mo agoThat is what arxiv is about. We have been facing the same problem with review processes by before. Nothing all too specific here.
- 5555watch 1mo agoAt least in my experience, the issue with ArXiv is that the expectation is that the draft should be already in a good enough state. And polishing plus writing the meat around the main result can take a lot of time
- riedel 29d agoThis is true, as preprints are addressing the 'problem' at a later point in time. I guess git is better if you do not want to assign an identifier to an immutable version yet.
- bambax 1mo agoYeah but that will not prevent the stealing, it will only make the fight easier afterwards.
- calf 1mo agoIf only prompts could also be watermarked.
- rsfern 1mo agoThe session data could be cryptographically signed. Probably easier in an open harness?
- 5555watch 1mo agoDoes it make sense to start privately and then open the repo after publication? Will the dates be retained? Also, isn't commit history easy to spoof?