3 ms·
An OpenAI employee did say so: https://x.com/tszzl/status/2097393423808377173 https://x.com/tszzl/status/2097393423808377173 it is exceptionally unlikely that
by tristanj 17d ago
An OpenAI employee did say so: https://x.com/tszzl/status/2097393423808377173 https://x.com/tszzl/status/2097393423808377173
it is exceptionally unlikely that anything they ever did made it into any part of training, and the chances are zero if they have opted out (likely). it would be a terrible precedent to break the the PII-scrubbing boundary to go and round it down to 0, and we won’t do it
- amazingman 17d agoAnd we all know how good OpenAI is at containing models during training...
- unsupp0rted 17d agoThat's an entirely different question
- ted_dunning 17d agoNot really. We have lots of examples now of their model doing what they say is impossible. Now we have another example of something that they say is impossible or very unlikely. Do we take their word for it this time? Really?