3 ms·
Because very few people actually have access to these logs, all access is monitored and recorded, and improper access will get you fired. It's not worth risking
by tristanj 1mo ago
Because very few people actually have access to these logs, all access is monitored and recorded, and improper access will get you fired. It's not worth risking your job over something like this.
- dumberquestions 1mo agoNot that I have strong reasons to think this is not true, but what reasons do we have to think it is? Has this been audited before?
- MathmoKiwi 1mo agoThere is almost zero risk to your job (quite the opposite, you might be richly rewarded!) if you're simply doing something here which the company wants done. (remember, billions and billions of dollars are at stake here! Do you really think there is no chance at all they would do it??)
- robotpepi 1mo ago> Because very few people actually have access to these logs, all access is monitored and recorded, and improper access will get you fired. It's not worth risking your job over something like this. That's beyond naive. The money this would mean for OpenAI (and the money they've already spent)...
- vatsachak 1mo agoOkay suppose that you have a trillion dollar competitor salivating at the mouth to ruin your business, which is based on user privacy. Why would you risk the trillions of dollars worth of business for the niche result of Navier-Stokes, which your average person cannot differentiate from a JEMS paper?
- desterothx 1mo agoBecause your competitor is likely doing the same thing, so they wont even try to call you out. Oh oh or because you're planning the largest IPO in history. The opinions of average people on the paper aren't going to be the ones reflected in the markets...
- defmacr0 1mo agoIf there's one thing I'm absolutely confident in, it's that Sam Altman personally goes to great lengths ensuring that ethical standards are upheld at his company.
- Laurel1234 1mo ago[dead]