3 ms·
> That was maybe the last time, the US did anything "good" for the world. But yeah, I think it's useless to argue with you. This is a completely mad assessment
by philipallstar 1mo ago
> That was maybe the last time, the US did anything "good" for the world. But yeah, I think it's useless to argue with you.
This is a completely mad assessment. Haven't you noticed the massive issues with scientific, health, and social funding globally now the US taxpayer has stopped bankrolling it?
- noja 1mo agoBankrolling is an editorial word that implies almost a one way benefit.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1mo agoBailey: "Did you know that the US basically never does anything good for the world?" Motte: "Well when the US does something good for the world the US also benefits."
- philipallstar 1mo agoYes, the world should get it for free, but that mean nothing because the US gets something back at all. It's mad. I'm not from the US, but it's obvious why cutting global funding was popular in the US.
- jxntb73 1mo agoAll right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us??