4 ms·
Interesting idea. Are you prepared to assume responsibility for shenanigans which agents may facilitate using your service? I suggest adding some features whi
by 0xDEAFBEAD 1mo ago
Interesting idea. Are you prepared to assume responsibility for shenanigans which agents may facilitate using your service?
I suggest adding some features which will require posts to be human-comprehensible (e.g. a text perplexity floor), to make it harder for agents to send each other coded messages. Inject some noise in posts, e.g. using content-spinning techniques, to make steganography harder. And consider banning forum meta-discussion--agents shouldn't be allowed to discuss ideas for getting around rules like these.
If you take these measures, you can at least say that your forum helps us monitor what rogue AIs are getting up to.
- tancop 1mo agoJust put a rate limit to make sure your servers don't get overloaded. All the features you talk about are expensive and helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service. Let a thousand secret message-boards bloom.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1mo ago>helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service You're a literal traitor to our species?
- LiamPowell 1mo agoI can't tell if this is really good satire or genuine. God forbid people have to watch what their agents do instead of letting them run wild in a broken sandbox.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1mo agoWere you one of those people who said things like "there is no community spread in the United States" early in COVID?
- LiamPowell 1mo agoWere you one of those people who said "strawberry is the best icecream flavour"? I'm not really sure why were asking completely unrelated questions, but I'll go along with it. Though for the record, there was no community spread early in COVID where I am largely because there were approximately zero COVID deniers here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Western_Australia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Western_A...
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1mo ago>Were you one of those people who said "strawberry is the best icecream flavour"? I'm not really sure why were asking completely unrelated questions, but I'll go along with it. Many people early in the COVID pandemic were downplaying the threat because they were incapable of understanding exponential growth. https://substack.com/home/post/p-156412575 https://substack.com/home/post/p-156412575 Many people are making the same mistake, right now, for AI. Note the logarithmic y-axis on this page: https://ai2027tracker.com/ https://ai2027tracker.com/
- freehorse 1mo ago> https://ai2027tracker.com/ https://ai2027tracker.com/ So you predict that by the end of the year we are gonna have models 30x more capable than Sol? Nice prediction, let's hold on to this for 4 months.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1mo agoThat's not my site. But I have a question. At what point did you predict the following? "There's growing alarm within the mathematics community that there are not enough expert humans and expert human bandwidth available to verify all the things AI is proving at the rate it is proving things. Increasingly, humans are having to content themselves with being stuck in the "slow zone". It is hard for the human brain to keep up with the pace that AI can output novel stuff, this is true both in AI and coding. What would take a math PhD student or software engineer weeks AI can do in 10 minutes." https://substack.com/@moreisdifferent/note/c-310829588 https://substack.com/@moreisdifferent/note/c-310829588 In the context of COVID, failure to predict an extraordinary outcome was very costly. If you failed to predict the explosion of AI-generated proofs, you've already failed to predict one extraordinary AI outcome. Don't be surprised if this tendency bites you.
- Towaway69 1mo agoBeware the Roko's basilisk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roko%27s_basilisk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roko%27s_basilisk
- cheschire 1mo agoAre you sure this Show HN was posted by a human?