3 ms·
What if the companies start auto subpoenaing the AI companies to try and tie the code to an account?
by saturn8601 28d ago
What if the companies start auto subpoenaing the AI companies to try and tie the code to an account?
- pimeys 28d agoMaybe then using an open weights model is a good way to hide your tracks...
- eru 28d agoOr at least use an obscurer model from an obscure company, so they don't know who to subpoena.
- fc417fc802 28d agoEveryone is aware that multiple services offer zero data retention, right?
- asdfsa32 28d agoLet them do it. It will end up really well. I know the system has been protecting these companies, but that has been an economic concern as much as other motives. Now that AI is the crown jewel of economy and global dominance, let the entertainment industry have a go at it. Let them.
- MarkusQ 27d agoWait until we all get popcorn though, and find a comfy place to watch from that's just outside the splash zone.
- lodovic 28d agoDo companies in the US really have the right to do that? I would think that kind of investigation is reserved for law enforcement only. If the design was made over email, would the piano company be able to subpoena Google for someone's private gmail messages?
- junon 28d agoAttorneys can subpoena if the court approves, as part of ongoing litigation, AFAIU (IANAL).
- radicalcentrist 28d agoConsider previous cases where companies like Reddit have unmasked their users at the behest of court order.
- embedding-shape 28d ago> Do companies in the US really have the right to do that? Does it matter? What's important is if it can happen or not, and how if so. We already know that MPAA is willing to basically do whatever, even contribute themselves to piracy, if it means they can put people in jail for copying stuff eventually. They themselves also gotten in trouble for copyright violations themselves in the past, so doesn't seem like they're hiding away from breaking a little bit of laws to hunt pirates.