3 ms·

What baffles me, isn't just that people don't see the low quality writing themselves, but that they must also be able to identify other's shit "LLM writings" ri

What baffles me, isn't just that people don't see the low quality writing themselves, but that they must also be able to identify other's shit "LLM writings" right? And realize how what they put out sounds exactly the same? Or did people completely stop reading what they've "wrote" before hitting that magical submit button?

IshKebab 1mo ago
Yeah I don't quite understand it either. Where's the intersection between people producing AI slop and people that have never read AI slop? I guess it's bigger than we thought... Or maybe they just don't give a shit. That's probably it.
- NateEag 1mo ago
  I suspect people who are putting out LLM "writing" are people who weren't trying to communicate in the first place. They were likely hunting for a better job, chasing the thrill of a million views, or similar - seeking a side effect of writing, rather than seeking to help someone else understand what was in their head.
jjice 1mo ago
It blows my mind. A customer of ours, whom I respect the technical opinion of, drops fully unedited Claude posts on LinkedIn now. I don't get how he thinks they read like anything but slop.
luxuryballs 1mo ago
if they had been half decent at writing before they would notice the quality issue, not being able to see it is also a writing skill issue, now it's just kind of spammy as people are just reaching for the tool in ai nighsosis
anigbrowl 1mo ago
People like this generally don't read, for pleasure or edification. Their posts are advertising, designed to work by repetition. They're not necessarily looking to persuade smart people; they're going after the same sort of people who want to fix problems with this one weird trick (doctors hate him!).
zahlman 29d ago
> isn't just that people don't see the low quality writing themselves, but that they must also be able to identify other's shit "LLM writings" right? This style emerged from a large number of people explicitly preferring it over alternatives when offering feedback. There is genuinely no accounting for taste (and if there were, many people would be in crippling debt).

IshKebab 1mo ago

Yeah I don't quite understand it either. Where's the intersection between people producing AI slop and people that have never read AI slop? I guess it's bigger than we thought... Or maybe they just don't give a shit. That's probably it.

NateEag 1mo ago
I suspect people who are putting out LLM "writing" are people who weren't trying to communicate in the first place. They were likely hunting for a better job, chasing the thrill of a million views, or similar - seeking a side effect of writing, rather than seeking to help someone else understand what was in their head.

jjice 1mo ago

It blows my mind. A customer of ours, whom I respect the technical opinion of, drops fully unedited Claude posts on LinkedIn now. I don't get how he thinks they read like anything but slop.

luxuryballs 1mo ago

if they had been half decent at writing before they would notice the quality issue, not being able to see it is also a writing skill issue, now it's just kind of spammy as people are just reaching for the tool in ai nighsosis

anigbrowl 1mo ago

People like this generally don't read, for pleasure or edification. Their posts are advertising, designed to work by repetition. They're not necessarily looking to persuade smart people; they're going after the same sort of people who want to fix problems with this one weird trick (doctors hate him!).

zahlman 29d ago

> isn't just that people don't see the low quality writing themselves, but that they must also be able to identify other's shit "LLM writings" right? This style emerged from a large number of people explicitly preferring it over alternatives when offering feedback. There is genuinely no accounting for taste (and if there were, many people would be in crippling debt).