3 ms·
> That site build cost $24 - extremely non-trivial for a simple frontend. I would say that $24 is trivial IF that's the final design. The truth is that the cos
by copperx 1mo ago
> That site build cost $24 - extremely non-trivial for a simple frontend.
I would say that $24 is trivial IF that's the final design. The truth is that the cost doesn't leave much room for error or experimentation.
- JumpCrisscross 1mo ago> truth is that the cost doesn't leave much room for error or experimentation Compared to what?
- copperx 1mo agoA cheap Chinese model, of course.
- kolinko 1mo agoWdym no room for error or experimation? Changes are even cheaper, and in my experience they are faster and way cheaper with models than with designers.
- paxys 1mo agoPlus you can offload a lot of work to a cheaper model
- risyachka 1mo ago>> The truth is that the cost doesn't leave much room for error or experimentation Yeah if you are solo developer without budget. For any business this is nothing, the ROI is massive.
- jermaustin1 1mo agoA bespoke design like that a year ago would have cost $200-2000+ between design and development. Hell, it probably still does unless the person wanting the design is already a developer who knows how to prompt. Everything costs more now than it did a year ago... except for THIS, and we are still complaining that a 90-99% reduction in cost is STILL too expensive. And a 50-75% reduction in time is STILL too long. We used to have to wait for weeks for a design like that when I worked at a consultancy, and that is a week of salary. For the design, then it got handed off to a front end developer to slice it and get built so the back end developer can hook it up to a CRM. We are talking a month turn around with design, revisions, development, testing, and bug fixing. It can now be done in a couple of hours for less than a single hour's cost. If it were 10x slower and 10x more expensive, it would STILL be "good deal".