3 ms·
So vague it’s useless. We cannot in a declarative sense define what is economically valuable work even now let alone into the future. People take what they ca
by fxd 1mo ago
So vague it’s useless.
We cannot in a declarative sense define what is economically valuable work even now let alone into the future.
People take what they can get for pay. Very few individuals can demand a wage. The value of employment is obviously designed around that, not some arbitrary definition of “valuable”.
Of course an AI will accept $0/hr, it doesn’t mean it does the job.
Anyone who could accurately define the value of work would be wildly successful without having to try.
That is not a useful definition for me unfortunately.
- jryle70 1mo agoThat's the challenge of defining intelligence. What is intelligence? Do you want to take a stab at defining/quantifying it? I'm s afraid anything specific you can come up with will also be useless.
- fxd 1mo agoNo it isn’t. Nobody said you had to equate “intelligence” with “value of work” and you got it wrong: I said it’s impossible to define that value, not intelligence. I’ve seen a dozen or so useful definitions of intelligence.