3 ms·

The OpenAI charter defines it as: "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work" https://time.com/article/2026/08/26/op

• fxd 29d ago
  So vague it’s useless. We cannot in a declarative sense define what is economically valuable work even now let alone into the future. People take what they can get for pay. Very few individuals can demand a wage. The value of employment is obviously designed around that, not some arbitrary definition of “valuable”. Of course an AI will accept $0/hr, it doesn’t mean it does the job. Anyone who could accurately define the value of work would be wildly successful without having to try. That is not a useful definition for me unfortunately.
  • jryle70 28d ago
    That's the challenge of defining intelligence. What is intelligence? Do you want to take a stab at defining/quantifying it? I'm s afraid anything specific you can come up with will also be useless.
    • fxd 28d ago
      No it isn’t. Nobody said you had to equate “intelligence” with “value of work” and you got it wrong: I said it’s impossible to define that value, not intelligence. I’ve seen a dozen or so useful definitions of intelligence.