5 ms·
>Why are you lying about what the other person said? Why do you see the truth as a lie? >They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud
by thataccount 1mo ago
>Why are you lying about what the other person said?
Why do you see the truth as a lie?
>They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.
Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years of "meaningful fraud that could change election results" happening. Heck, it actually goes all the way back to the Civil War and while history records Lincoln being elected, the cheating was such his election almost wasn't.
- wtfwhateven 1mo ago>Why do you see the truth as a lie? I don't. Read what I said again. You were lying about what the other person said, i.e. attacking a strawman. >Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years of "meaningful fraud that could change election results" happening. No there isn't, not in the US. Substantiate your claim.