3 ms·

It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I

It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.

solid_fuel 1mo ago
“It’s very specific” “Just look up vague abuses that I’m claiming happened with no evidence”
- thataccount 1mo ago
  >https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-postal-service-is-running-a-running-a-covert-operations-program-that-monitors-americans-social-media-posts-160022919.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-postal-service-is-running-a-r... Here is one instance among many.
  - CamperBob2 1mo ago
    What does that have to do with anything discussed here? Wait'll you hear about the Comstock Act and what the USPS has done to enforce that.
    - thataccount 1mo ago
      [flagged]
wat10000 1mo ago
"Specific" would involve some sort of detail about what these abuses were, or when they happened, or something beyond just "previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau."
- thataccount 1mo ago
  [flagged]
  - wat10000 1mo ago
    The fun thing about being extremely vague is that it's inherently unsearchable. I can do a search and find reports of USPIS abuses, but I have no idea if they're the ones you're referring to or not, because you didn't say what you were referring to. And I'm not about to spend a bunch of time trying to work out which ones you meant and how they might connect to voting by mail when you can't be bothered to give even the slightest bit of information.
    - thataccount 1mo ago
      [flagged]
      - doc_ick 1mo ago
        All right Mike Lindell calm down
  - muwtyhg 1mo ago
    How does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud?
    - thataccount 1mo ago
      >How does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud? The absence of outrage on one issue concerning the Postal Service, and the presence of it for another. How come you couldn't understand that point?
      - muwtyhg 1mo ago
        > How come you couldn't understand that point? Because you're vague-posting continually. > The absence of outrage on one issue concerning the Postal Service, and the presence of it for another. I don't see how the "absence of outrage" over a completely separate issue in any way proves your point about mail-in voting being abused.

It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.

solid_fuel 1mo ago

“It’s very specific” “Just look up vague abuses that I’m claiming happened with no evidence”

thataccount 1mo ago
>https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-postal-service-is-running-a-running-a-covert-operations-program-that-monitors-americans-social-media-posts-160022919.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-postal-service-is-running-a-r... Here is one instance among many.
- CamperBob2 1mo ago
  What does that have to do with anything discussed here? Wait'll you hear about the Comstock Act and what the USPS has done to enforce that.
  - thataccount 1mo ago
    [flagged]

wat10000 1mo ago

"Specific" would involve some sort of detail about what these abuses were, or when they happened, or something beyond just "previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau."

thataccount 1mo ago
[flagged]
- wat10000 1mo ago
  The fun thing about being extremely vague is that it's inherently unsearchable. I can do a search and find reports of USPIS abuses, but I have no idea if they're the ones you're referring to or not, because you didn't say what you were referring to. And I'm not about to spend a bunch of time trying to work out which ones you meant and how they might connect to voting by mail when you can't be bothered to give even the slightest bit of information.
  - thataccount 1mo ago
    [flagged]
    - doc_ick 1mo ago
      All right Mike Lindell calm down
- muwtyhg 1mo ago
  How does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud?
  - thataccount 1mo ago
    >How does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud? The absence of outrage on one issue concerning the Postal Service, and the presence of it for another. How come you couldn't understand that point?
    - muwtyhg 1mo ago
      > How come you couldn't understand that point? Because you're vague-posting continually. > The absence of outrage on one issue concerning the Postal Service, and the presence of it for another. I don't see how the "absence of outrage" over a completely separate issue in any way proves your point about mail-in voting being abused.