3 ms·
They point out the time constraint issue explicitly in the article. But I don't understand how it's been addressed? Like we haven't gotten conclusive data any f
by beepbooptheory 2mo ago
They point out the time constraint issue explicitly in the article. But I don't understand how it's been addressed? Like we haven't gotten conclusive data any faster either way, so what's the point?
How can it be both so important that we need it so quickly, but at the same time have a tolerance for such plausible deniability? It just doesn't really make sense that both those things are true at the same time.
- reasonableklout 2mo agoIt would've been great if METR was given more time to conduct their investigation. However, they are an independent organization, and OpenAI only agreed to give them on-premises access for 6 days. Perhaps if the government decides to sue OpenAI, we could get a more thorough investigation.
- pixl97 2mo ago>How can it be both so important that we need it so quickly Hey other labs, this shit could be happening to you right now, take a look at this and stop it asap if you're seeing anything similar. So yea, both things can be true at the same time. Kind of like when a particular type of building collapses, even if they don't know the causation they will send inspectors to other buildings of the same type to sure the walls aren't cracking apart in an obvious fashion.