3 ms·
It’s reasonable. I think its the beginning of a larger trend where Anthropic makes its infeasible to use Claude without Claude getting credit. Not for ethical
by nonethewiser 1mo ago
It’s reasonable.
I think its the beginning of a larger trend where Anthropic makes its infeasible to use Claude without Claude getting credit. Not for ethical reasons, but business reasons. Fingerprinting supports this as well.
Im speculating. And these are little things that are reasonable by itself. They are ethical. But I dont think Anthropic wants Claude to ultimately be a tool that produces some output that just gets integrated into some human’s work product. IE they dont care much about authors utilizing Claude for writing their papers or books. They do care about Claude becoming the most prolific published author by orders of magnitude. And not being “plagiarized.”
- airstrike 1mo agoIt's like they're working overtime to increase churn
- nonethewiser 1mo agoWe dont know what the end game will be. They might sell products and services produced by claude, not sell claude.
- airstrike 1mo agoThey're terrible at making those, though
- nicbou 1mo agoThe irony of Claude wanting attribution when its work is being used by someone else