3 ms·
> Supporting indigenous people and their rights to their native homelands is not xenophobic. Xenophobia leads to the belief that white Danes need support for t
by e12e 1mo ago
> Supporting indigenous people and their rights to their native homelands is not xenophobic.
Xenophobia leads to the belief that white Danes need support for their rights to their native homeland.
It's not like this is some great battle to rise restitution for Native Americans, Maori or Aborigines.
It's about not having to see so many non-white faces in Copenhagen or London.
> Enforcing immigration laws is not ethnic cleansing.
That certainly depends on the law, and the enforcement.
More to the point: trampling nomadic sub- cultures, forcefully denying them access where they have lived for centuries, denying them their way of life - can certainly result in genocide ("the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group").
- throwawaypath 1mo ago>Xenophobia leads to the belief that white Danes need support for their rights to their native homeland. False, the UN has stated that indigenous people have rights to their native homeland. Has nothing to do with xenophobia. >It's not like this is some great battle to rise restitution for Native Americans, Maori or Aborigines. Maybe the Native Americans, Maori, etc. shouldn't have let so many immigrants in. >It's about not having to see so many non-white faces in Copenhagen or London. Nowhere did DHH state anything about White, or only White people allowed. You're imagining that. >That certainly depends on the law, and the enforcement. Not at all. Countries have the right to enforce immigration. Immigration enforcement is not ethnic cleansing. >More to the point: trampling nomadic sub- cultures, forcefully denying them access where they have lived for centuries Roma have not lived there for centuries. >denying them their way of life - can certainly result in genocide Sending people back to their homes is not genocide.