2 ms·
Slightly more expensive than the (post-price hike) DS4 flash pricing, but in the ballpark. https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731/z-ai/g
by nateb2022 2mo ago
Slightly more expensive than the (post-price hike) DS4 flash pricing, but in the ballpark.
https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731/z-ai/glm-5.3-flash https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-073...
- walrus01 2mo agoComparison should be to 0731
- nateb2022 2mo agoupdated thanks
- drob518 2mo agoHm. GLM is more expensive in all dimensions than DS but it has a lower weighted average input? How is that?? Something seems off. EDIT: Looks like they are swizzling around the pricing dynamically on that page, on both the GLM and the DS sides, so who knows.
- desterothx 2mo agoI mean, it implies that it has an even better cache hit rate that DS flash, which is impressive, as the chr on DS flash was already really good in my experience
- nateb2022 2mo agoI think the weighted average takes into account all providers (some DS4 flash providers are 'premium' providers and offering higher speeds for higher pricing) and these are tilting the scale
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]